0
View Post
February Workgroup Highlights Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization with a Member Panel and MVC Data

February Workgroup Highlights Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization with a Member Panel and MVC Data

In February, the Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC) hosted a virtual cardiac rehabilitation workgroup presentation featuring a panel of cardiac care specialists. The panel focused on discussing chronic heart failure metrics related to the pay for performance (P4P) program and how cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can play a vital part in the recovery process for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. The MVC Coordinating Center hosts workgroup presentations once or twice per month, covering a variety of topics including post-discharge follow-up, sepsis, cardiac rehabilitation, rural health, preoperative testing, and health in action.

Cardiac Rehabilitation Workgroup – MVC and Member Panel 

For this workgroup MVC was joined by panelists Tyelor Wymer, CEP, BS, Cardiology Supervisor at University of Michigan Health (UMH) Sparrow-Clinton; Laura Meiste, RN, BSN, Manager of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation at Holland Hospital; Zach Johnson, BS, ACSM-CEP, Lead Exercise Physiologist for Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs at Corewell Health; Greg Scharf, BS, CEP, CCRP, Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System Manager at MyMichigan Health; and Mike Thompson, PhD, MPH, Associate Professor of Cardiac Surgery at Michigan Medicine

CHF Goals and Metrics

MVC’s Site Engagement Coordinator Emily Bair, MS, MPH, RDN, CSP, began the workgroup by reviewing CHF P4P metrics for program years 2026 – 2027, which is part of MVC’s Cardiac Rehabilitation Value-Based Initiative. These included an episode spending metric focused on CHF episodes of care and a value metric that tracks the 7-day follow up care for CHF episodes of care. In addition to discussing the P4P CHF metrics, Bair reviewed current CR standards that MVC uses for measuring the CR value-based initiative, including Michigan Cardiac Rehabilitation Network (MiCR) standards and the Million Hearts Campaign CR goal for CHF patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1. MVC, MiCR and Million Hearts CR Goals for CHF Patients

Presentation slide titled "Goals & Metrics" outlining cardiac rehabilitation follow-up and start rate targets. It lists MVC P4P Metrics with a 7-day follow-up after CHF, Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network aiming for 10% of CHF patients to start CR within 365 days, and Million Hearts with ACC and AHA targeting 70% of eligible patients to start CR within 365 days.

MVC Registry and Data Reports Resources

Bair highlighted some of MVC’s relevant data reports and how the episodes of care are built within the MVC data registry. Bair noted that MVC episodes of care have a slightly different post-discharge window for CHF patients in CR, 365 days (Figure 2), versus the 30 – 90-day windows for patients with cardiac conditions such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The MVC data registry has several useful cardiac related reports including,

Multi-payer CR reports which evaluate CR utilization and other metrics provided in MVC’s hospital-level reports:

  • CR Utilization Rates
  • CR Utilization Rankings
  • Mean Days to First CR Visit
  • Mean Number of CR Visits

Payer specific reports which allow registry users to investigate utilization, readmissions rates, and cost of care including:

  • Episode Payment Report
  • Episode Utilization Rate Report
  • Readmissions Report
  • CR Report

Figure 2. Example of MVC Registry CR Utilization Rate within 365 Days After Discharge for CHF, Jan. 2024 – Mar. 2025 (MVC All, blinded):

Dotted line graph

The graph above shows that from Jan. 2024 – Mar. 2025, the MVC All average was  6% for CR participation within 365-days post-discharge for CHF patients. With the MiCR goal being a 10% CR utilization for CHF patients and the overall utilization range being 0% to 19%, it is clear there is room for improvement across the MVC member portfolio.

Push reports are another useful resource offered by MVC. The Process Measures Report that MVC shared with members in January 2025 had helpful visuals of site and system 7-day follow up data for CHF episodes of care (Figure 3).

Figure 3. MVC Process Measures Report – 7-day follow up after CHF

example of MVC Process Measures Report for 7-Day Follow-Up After CHF content including vertical bar charts and line graphs

Panel Discussion

The focus for the panel discussion centered around how CR services can be utilized to support rehabilitation of CHF patients who may not be able to participate in rehabilitation as quickly as those that have conditions such as PCI or CABG. Bair began the discussion by leading participants through a common care pathway for CHF patients who utilize CR (Figure 4).

Figure 4. CHF Follow-Up and Cardiac Rehabilitation Typical Patient Pathway

Diagram illustrating the typical CHF patient pathway with five key stages: Admission, Discharge, Follow-Up, Cardiac Rehab, and Readmission. Annotations highlight transitions such as patient diagnosis, care shift from inpatient to outpatient, appointment scheduling, referral placement, and follow-up care including rehab and emergency department utilization.

CHF Barriers to Care and Change Concepts

To help organize a solutions-based approach, Bair went on to introduce the Change Concepts Model, 2nd Ed. (Figure 5) adapted from the Million Hearts Initiative to address some of the common barriers seen in CHF care.

From the Million Hearts Change Package, 2nd Ed., some notable barriers to care for CHF follow-up in CR include:

  • Patient or provider lack of awareness
  • Lack of clear and consistent communication
  • No integration of CHF cardiac rehabilitation needs into cardiovascular services or workflows
  • Limited capacity of CR programs
  • Patient transportation, financial burden, competing responsibilities or cultural/language barriers

Figure 5. Million Hearts Change Concepts

Flowchart illustrating four stages of a process: Systems Change, Referrals, Enrollment and Participation, and Adherence.

Systems Level Change

Bair shared some of the ways systems change could be implemented including establishing a hospital CHF champion, engaging hospital administrators and senior staff, securing and maintaining a multidisciplinary workforce, engaging the cardiac care team in the follow-up care and rehabilitation planning, tracking follow-up/CR referrals, enrollment rates, and patient participation as quality-of-care indicators.

UMH Sparrow-Clinton’s Tyelor Wymer shared that they have had success with appointing CHF champions in their centralized cardiac care team. Team members rotate through four to five different UMH Sparrow hospitals, fostering consistent care practices across the health system. MyMichigan Health System’s Greg Scharf shared that they have a similar system wide collaborative team for heart failure care, and they have had great success as well.

At Holland Hospital, Laura Meiste shared that they have a care transitions team that works in the cardiology department and focuses specifically on patient follow-up within seven days of discharge, while also working on maintaining consistent communication with the administrative staff that schedules patient appointments.

Optimizing Referrals

Another opportunity to reduce barriers to care is by improving the referral process itself. This can be done by using data to drive improvements and incorporating referrals into standardized processes. Some examples include:

  • Adding CHF cardiac rehabilitation language to echo reports for patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) that meet the appropriate criteria for CR
  • Including a referral to CR in order sets for patients with CHF
  • Adding CR to guideline-directed medical therapy algorithms for patients with CHF

Scharf shared that optimizing referrals is an ongoing challenge in MyMichigan Health’s system where there might be a standardized best practice advisory (BPA) for CHF in general, but there is no built-in trigger for flagging a CHF case as CR appropriate. Working in the Epic electronic health record (EHR) program, they can create custom BPAs for this, but it takes time and education.

Meiste shared that at Holland Hospital, an auto-referral process through an order set triggers a case in the system to be sent to clinical staff for CR eligibility screening. If the case meets eligibility criteria, the staff will set up an in-person visit with the patient. Similarly, workgroup participant Karolina Kaser, BSN, RN, MBA, CIC, Quality, Safety and Experience Director for Corewell Health Dearborn, shared that their site utilizes standardized clinical pathways for their cardiac cases. Included in the pathway is an order set that automatically includes a CR referral even for CHF cases. Some other effective processes have been to utilize the cardiac nurses to ensure CHF patients have CR offered if they meet criteria, as well as training administrative and call center staff on the importance of scheduling these follow-up appointments.

Enrollment and Participation

Increasing enrollment is a key goal in the Million Hearts change concept. This may include methods of optimizing care coordination for patients by promoting enrollment into CR at follow-up appointments and reducing delay from discharge to their first CR appointment. This can be done by using data to drive improvement in follow-up appointments and enrollment numbers, and by developing flexible delivery models such as hybrid CR programs. MiCR tools and resources also help to boost CR enrollment.

Supporting Adherence and Reducing Non-Medical Barriers

The next step in the change concept process is finding ways to reduce inconsistent adherence to a CR program. Some recommendations to address this issue included identifying populations at risk for low engagement, accounting for patient needs such as lack of transportation, incorporating motivational incentives, and utilizing automated communications and reminders.

Zach Johnson from Corewell Health System shared that they have a successful support group established that meets quarterly. The group includes a range of patients who have either completed the CR program or those who are just beginning their journey to recovery. To address some of the common barriers for patients, Corewell has partnered with Michigan Rehabilitation Services to help cover a patient’s copay with a contingency that the patient plans to return to work for a minimum of 20 hours per week in the future.

To address transportation barriers, Corewell has partnered with True North which is funded by a family donation fund. If a patient meets the criteria for being at or below poverty level, they will qualify to receive financial assistance to cover the cost of transportation to and from visits. Holland Hospital’s Meiste shared they have utilized a mini grant awarded from the MiCR initiative to fund their heart failure orientation and to offer copay assistance to patients in need.

Opportunities for Further Improvement

Bair rounded out the panel discussion by asking panelists to describe unique challenges they identified when trying to incorporate CHF patients into CR programs. In response to Scharf’s inquiry about strategies to connect with patients who have CHF but have not yet met the 35% EF criteria, MVC Faculty Advisor, Mike Thompson shared that cardiac clinicians at Michigan Medicine are having CR conversations with CHF patients earlier in the disease process.

Additionally, lack of a standardized approach to discussing cardiac rehab for patients at 40% - 35% EF range is a common concern. Wymer shared that UMH Sparrow-Clinton addressed this by encouraging clinicians to urge patients who fall within the 35 – 40% EF range to begin participating in CR before their condition deteriorates further. MVC members can raise awareness by following and reposting BMC2 and MVC on LinkedIn.

MVC Cardiac Rehabilitation Workgroup: Feb. 10, 2026

MVC welcomes workgroup presenters from across Michigan to share their expertise, success stories, initiatives, and solution-focused ideas with MVC members. Please email us if you are interested in being a workgroup presenter or submit a presentation proposal online.

0
View Post
Cardiac Rehabilitation Awareness Week Spotlighted Resources and Tools Improving Cardiac Rehab Enrollment

Cardiac Rehabilitation Awareness Week Spotlighted Resources and Tools Improving Cardiac Rehab Enrollment

MVC and BMC2 took to LinkedIn recently to celebrate Cardiac Rehab Awareness Week, spotlighting the importance of cardiac rehabilitation for patients recovering from cardiovascular events. MVC and BMC2 collaborate to lead the Michigan Cardiac Rehab network (MiCR) and its related offerings. Across multiple posts, both teams highlighted stories, tools, collaborations, and insights designed to support providers, patients, and programs working to improve cardiac rehab outcomes in Michigan.

One of the central themes of the week was the voice of the patient. MiCR shared the first completed patient story from a new storytelling initiative called Heart-to-Heart, developed with the Healthy Behavior Optimization for Michigan (HBOM) team. This initiative amplifies real patient experiences, bringing to light why cardiac rehab matters — not just clinically, but personally — for those considering participation. Cardiac rehab week marked the launch of the first available patient story about a patient named Margaret from Covenant Healthcare.

Cardiac Rehab Week also offered opportunities for networking and knowledge exchange. MVC hosted a virtual cardiac rehab workgroup [view video] focused on optimizing congestive heart failure (CHF) follow-up and increasing rehab enrollment in this especially vulnerable patient population. Featuring panelists from Corewell Health, Holland Hospital, Michigan Medicine, MyMichigan Health, and University of Michigan Health-Sparrow, this session highlighted real-world strategies and insights for improving care transitions and referral practices.

Throughout the week, both organizations also shared posts featuring practical tools to strengthen cardiac rehab engagement, such as:

  • NewBeat Resources: BMC2 highlighted NewBeat materials — engaging, evidence-based education and referral tools designed to help care teams talk with patients about the benefits of cardiac rehab and support meaningful discussions that lead to enrollment (Figure 1). A new round of no-cost printing for MiCR sites was announced, offering flexible, ready-to-use materials that programs can request.
  • Cardiac Rehab Center Finder: Knowing “where to go” is a crucial earliest step. MVC and BMC2 reinforced the MichiganCR.org searchable directory that allows patients and providers to locate nearby rehab programs. This simple tool reduces a key barrier to engagement by connecting patients with access points across Michigan.
  • Resource Library Spotlight: The MiCR Resource Library was featured as a one-stop hub for tools — from evidence-based products to collaborative resources developed with partners throughout the state — supporting both providers and patients as they plan, refer, and participate in cardiac rehab sessions.

Figure 1. Cardiac Rehab Resource Materials

decorative

Recognizing the evolving landscape of cardiac rehabilitation delivery, MiCR also took the opportunity to highlight its newest strategic efforts throughout cardiac rehab week, including its explorations into the role of telehealth in cardiac rehab as well as medication management opportunities. Updates on these efforts and more were summarized and linked in a summary blog to the MiCR website. To learn more, read the MiCR summary.

As the week wrapped, the MiCR teams thanked everyone for their role in advancing cardiac rehab throughout Michigan, and invited their active participation going forward—either by trying a MiCR tool in their daily work or sharing their experiences and stories. As MiCR continues its work, the momentum from this week sets the stage for meaningful improvement in patient outcomes and program engagement statewide.

0
View Post
January Workgroups Highlight Using Claims Data to Drive Sepsis QI and Reducing SSIs Through Multidisciplinary Collaboration

January Workgroups Highlight Using Claims Data to Drive Sepsis QI and Reducing SSIs Through Multidisciplinary Collaboration

In January, Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC) kicked off the 2026 workgroup calendar with a sepsis workgroup focused on helping members better understand how to use claims-based data to support sepsis quality improvement (QI) efforts. The session featured an overview of sepsis-related reporting available on the MVC registry followed by an example of how custom analytic reports can be used to dig deeper into areas of clinical interest. The second workgroup of the month, a health in action presentation, featured Corewell Health Farmington Hills Hospital’s multi-year QI initiative aimed at reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery. The MVC Coordinating Center hosts one to two workgroup presentations per month covering a variety of topics including post-discharge follow-up, sepsis, cardiac rehabilitation, rural health, preoperative testing, and health in action.

Sepsis Workgroup – MVC Coordinating Center

The workgroup opened with a presentation by MVC’s Site Engagement Coordinator Rachel Folk, MHA, who walked participants through the types of sepsis related data available in the MVC registry and how members can use these reports to support local QI initiatives. The presentation emphasized that MVC’s claims-based data registry allows members to examine sepsis episodes of care across multiple payers and care settings, providing a broader view of healthcare utilization and outcomes than many internal data sources alone.

Participants were introduced to several registry reports that are particularly relevant to sepsis analysis, including:

  • Episode Payments Report, which shows total, price-standardized payments for 30- or 90-day episodes and can be used as a proxy for assessments of utilization across inpatient, professional, post-acute, and readmission services.
  • Episode Utilization Rates Report, which breaks down where patients receive care during and after an episode, such as skilled nursing facilities, home health, inpatient rehabilitation, or emergency department visits.
  • Readmissions Report, which allows members to explore readmission rates for patients by time interval and whether patients return to the index hospital or are readmitted elsewhere.
  • Comorbidities Report, which highlights common coexisting conditions among patients and supports a deeper understanding of patient complexity.
  • Payment by Condition Report, which compares case volume and utilization across conditions and helps contextualize sepsis relative to other medical episodes.

The presentation also included a review of sepsis-related Pay for Performance (P4P) reports available in the MVC registry including a Value Metric Summary Report and Value Metric Trends Report, which allow users to assess their current performance, improvement and achievement baselines and trends over time (Figures 1 and 2). Folk explained how these reports can help teams visualize progress relative to peer hospitals and MVC-wide averages.

Figure 1. MVC Data Registry Value Metric Summary – Blinded Report

MVC Data Registry Value Metric Summary table – Blinded Report

Figure 2. MVC Data Registry Value Metric Trends – Blinded Report

MVC Data Registry Value Metric Trends line graph – Blinded Report

Throughout the presentation, Folk additionally highlighted key registry features such as filtering by hospital type, payer, episode length, patient demographics, and episode time frame. She also reviewed case suppression thresholds and reminded participants that MVC’s data are risk adjusted, allowing for fairer comparisons across hospitals with differing patient populations.

Using Claims Data to Support Improvement

A recurring theme of the discussion was the importance of approaching the registry with curiosity. Participants were encouraged to consider the “five W’s” when reviewing their data and to use the available benchmarking opportunities to compare their hospital’s performance against similar hospitals to help identify realistic opportunities for improvement.

Polling during the session revealed that many participants had limited or no prior experience with an MVC registry review. Registry reviews are a dedicated opportunity for MVC staff to walk members through their site-specific data, focusing on the reports and metrics most relevant to their individual goals. These reviews can help teams move beyond high-level trends to more actionable questions about variation, utilization, and outcomes.

If you’re interested in setting up a time to complete a registry review, please email MVC.

Applying Custom Analytics to Sepsis Care

The workgroup concluded with a second presentation by MVC Analyst Janet Zhang, MPH, highlighting how custom analytic reports can be used to explore specific questions not fully addressed by standard registry reports. Using a recent example focused on sepsis patients and the impact of palliative care, Zang demonstrated how tailored analyses can provide deeper insight into care patterns, outcomes, and opportunities for improvement.

MVC encourages members interested in deeper analyses via custom report to submit a request through the Coordinating Center [Link].

MVC Sepsis Workgroup: Jan. 13, 2026

Health in Action Workgroup – Corewell Health Farmington Hills Hospital

MVC’s second workgroup of January featured Jennifer Hengy, BSN, RN, Internal Quality Improvement Specialist, Dr. Eugene Laveroni, Chief of Surgery, and Leslie Smith, RPh, JD, BCPS, BCIDP, Clinical Pharmacist Specialist from Corewell Health Farmington Hills. Together they showcased how a multidisciplinary team used data, evidence-based guidelines, and workflow redesign to drive meaningful improvements in patients’ safety by reducing SSIs in colorectal surgery.

SSIs remain a significant source of patient harm and financial penalty for hospitals nationwide. Despite advances in sterile technique and surgical technology, data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continue to show SSIs occur at alarming rates. As Hengy explained, their local data mirrored this challenge with an SSI rate of 9.6% in colorectal surgeries in 2023. This signaled an urgent need for targeted improvement. For Farmington Hills, this started with building the right team.

Building a Team

The initial improvement committee included surgical leadership, quality improvement specialists, pharmacy, nursing education, and anesthesia, with additional stakeholders added as new insights emerged. This diverse group ensured that clinical expertise, frontline workers, and data review were all represented throughout the project. Another key principle of the initiative was fostering a non-punitive culture. Chart reviews and peer discussion focused on learning and system improvement rather than individual blame, helping to sustain engagement across disciplines.

The Discovery Phase: Identifying Key Gaps

The discovery phase proved to be the most challenging but ultimately the most impactful, Hengy shared. The team conducted detailed chart reviews of SSI cases to better understand contributing factors, examining elements including:

  • Use of clean closing gloves, gowns, and closing packs
  • Skin preparation and closure techniques
  • Antibiotic selection, timing, and infusion duration
  • Documentation of infections present at the time of surgery (or PATOS)

Early interventions focused on education about documentation, standardized closing packs, and surgical techniques. While these steps led to modest improvements, they did not produce the level of change the team was seeking so they turned to the experts in antibiotics.

Optimizing Antibiotic Selection and Timing

A deeper dive into perioperative antibiotic practices at Farmington Hills revealed variability in both the antibiotics chosen and their infusion timing. The team identified frequent use of second-line antibiotics in patients with reported penicillin allergies, as well as inconsistencies ensuring antibiotics were fully infused prior to surgical incision.

Smith, a clinical pharmacist specializing in antimicrobial stewardship and a member of Corewell Health Farmington Hills’ SSI workgroup explained that cefazolin remains the preferred first-line prophylactic antibiotic for colorectal surgery and can be safely administered to most patients with reported penicillin allergies. Pharmacy-led education highlighted Cefazolin’s uniquely low risk of cross-reactivity and proven lower SSI rates compared to non-beta-lactam alternatives. Education was delivered through multiple channels, including surgical quality meetings, residents and provider training, newsletters, and real-time feedback to reinforce adherence to standardized protocols.

In addition, the team redesigned workflows to address infusion timing. New processes ensured that antibiotics requiring longer infusion times were started earlier in the preoperative phase. The use of visual job aids, memory tools, and Omnicell alerts reinforced these changes at the point of care (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 3. Timing of Preoperative Antibiotic Infusion Flyer

Timing of Preoperative Antibiotic Infusion Flyer

Figure 4. Recommended Antibiotic Re-Dosing Interval Guideline Table for Patients Currently Receiving Antibiotics

Recommended Antibiotic Re-Dosing Interval Guideline Table for Patients Currently Receiving Antibiotics

Outcomes and Impact

Following implementation of these antibiotic-focused interventions and revised workflows, Corewell Health Farmington Hills observed a substantial reduction in colorectal SSIs with an infection ratio (SIR) of 0% between February 2024 and August 2024. In conclusion, the presenters emphasized that while zero harm is an aspirational goal, the consistency of guideline adherence and the sustainability of improved practices represented their major successes.

MVC Health in Action Workgroup: Jan. 29, 2026

MVC welcomes workgroup presenters from across Michigan to share their expertise, success stories, initiatives, and solution-focused ideas with MVC members. Please reach out to us via email or by submitting a presentation proposal using this form if you are interested in sharing your work.

0
View Post
MVC Thanks Presenters from the Second Half of 2025

MVC Thanks Presenters from the Second Half of 2025

The MVC Coordinating Center wishes to express our deep appreciation for the 31 dedicated healthcare professionals who volunteered to present at MVC’s third and fourth quarter 2025 virtual workgroups, fall collaborative-wide meeting, and the Michigan Cardiac Rehabilitation network (MiCR) fall meeting. We know that MVC’s members and partners have many demands on their time from within their own organizations and beyond. Nonetheless, these 31 guest speakers shared their data, innovative approaches, best practices, and lessons learned with MVC members to support our shared goals of peer learning and high-value care delivery for all Michigan patients. We celebrate you for contributing in this important way, some at multiple events. You DO make a difference!

Join us in giving these folks a well-deserved round of applause:

Health in Action Workgroup

  • Amanda Escalera-Torres, RD, Program Director for Hurley Medical Center Food FARMacy Program
  • Leah Julian, BA, Innovation in Behavioral Health (IBH) Specialist, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS)
  • Lindsey Naeyaert, MPH, Service Delivery Transformation Section Manager, MDHHS

Post-Discharge Follow-Up Workgroup

  • Sara Hagerman, BSN, RN, Quality/Performance Improvement Specialist, University of Michigan Health - Sparrow Carson
  • Noa Kim, MSI, Informatics Design Lead, Healthy Behavior Optimization of Michigan (HBOM)
  • Larrea Young, MDes, Human-Centered Design Project Manager, HBOM

Preoperative Testing Workgroup

  • Amy Poindexter, BSN, RN, Performance Improvement Analyst, Holland Hospital
  • Kelly Lewton, RN, BSN, Performance Improvement Coordinator, Lake Huron Medical Center
  • Nicole Mott, MD, MSCR, Resident Physician and Post-Doctoral Fellow, University of Colorado & University of Michigan

Rural Health Workgroup

  • Lindsey Crouch, RN, Program Director, Hillsdale Community Health Center Mobile Health Clinic
  • Victoria Durr, BSN, RN, Infection Prevention Coordinator, Scheurer Health

Sepsis Workgroup

  • Errin Couck, RN, BSN, HMS Sepsis Abstractor, Henry Ford Health Macomb
  • Brandie DeVos, RN, MSN, Sepsis Coordinator, Henry Ford Health Macomb

Fall Collaborative-Wide Meeting Keynote Speaker

  • Gloria Rey, PA-C, MPH, Director of Post-Acute Care, Populance Henry Ford Health

Fall Collaborative-Wide Meeting Podium and Breakout Session Speakers

  • Brad Iott, PhD, MPH, Content Expert in Health Informatics and Social Care Integration, MSHIELD
  • Julia Weinert, MPH, Program Manager, MSHIELD
  • Amanda Biskner, RN, Paramedic, CP-C, Community Paramedicine Coordinator, Tri-Hospital EMS
  • Kelly Clark, MD, Faculty, Munson Family Medicine Residency Program and Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine at Michigan State University
  • Belinda Dokic, CPhT, BA, MBA, Clinically Integrated Network Program Manager, Trinity Health Livonia
  • Michael Gatt, MD, Gynecologist, Trinity Health Livonia
  • Holly Gould, MSN, CNM, RN, Director of Quality Improvement and Organizational Excellence, McLaren Port Huron
  • Nicole Luczak, President and CEO, United Way Bay County
  • Greg Scharf, BS, ACSM-CEP, AACVPR-CCRP, Cardiopulmonary Rehab System Manager, MyMichigan Medical Center - Midland

MiCR Fall In-Person Meeting Keynote Speaker

  • Stacey Greenway, MPH, MS, President of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR)

MiCR Fall In-Person Meeting Podium Speakers

  • Barry Franklin, PhD, Director (Emeritus), Preventive Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Corewell Health East, William Beaumont University Hospital
  • Megan Gross, MPH, CHES, ACSMCEP, EIM, Clinical Exercise Physiologist, Holland Hospital
  • Cindy Haskin-Popp, MS, CEP Manager, Cardiology, Corewell Health East
  • Amy Poindexter, BS, CEP, Performance Improvement Analyst, Trinity Ann Arbor
  • Brett Reynolds, MPH, ACSM-CEP, Supervisor of Cardiology, Corewell Health East
  • David Running, BS, CEP, Supervisor-Cardiac Rehab, University of Michigan Health West
  • Amber Steele, ACSM-CEP, Cardiac Rehab Lead, McLaren Bay Region
  • Larrea Young, MDes, Human-Centered Design Project Manager, HBOM
thank you graphic

The MVC members and partners who attend MVC events appreciated these presenters, too. Here are just a few of the many glowing survey responses MVC received about presenters and their content in 2025.

presentation attendee testimonials

As a reminder, past workgroups and virtual networking event recordings can be viewed on MVC’s YouTube channel, and presentation slides and materials from MVC’s fall collaborative-wide meeting can be viewed here.

Do you have valuable information to share?

Whether you are new to presenting or a seasoned pro, the MVC Coordinating Center is here to support you every step of the way. From exploring topic ideas to preparing information and managing event logistics, our team makes the experience of presenting easy and comfortable. The P4P points you can earn as a presenter are a great benefit to your organization, too. For more information about presenting, contact the MVC Coordinating Center or submit a proposal here.

0
View Post
MVC Welcomes Faculty Advisor and Physician Ryan Howard

MVC Welcomes Faculty Advisor and Physician Ryan Howard

I am so excited to be joining the Michigan Value Collaborative as a Senior Faculty Advisor. I’ve worked closely with the Collaborative Quality Initiatives for the last decade and am thrilled to continue that work in this new role!

By way of introduction, I am a surgeon and healthcare researcher at the University of Michigan. I am Maize and Blue through and through, having completed my undergrad, medical school, residency, and fellowship at the University of Michigan. My clinical practice focuses on bariatric and hernia surgery, and I also specialize in comprehensive obesity treatment with medications and other non-surgical options. What I love most about my practice is partnering with patients to help them accomplish their goals and live their life to the fullest.

My research focuses on studying the quality and safety of surgical care. My passion is taking what we discover through research and turning it into real-world improvements for our patients. To that end, I conduct studies that identify opportunities to improve care, then I use those findings to inform quality improvement efforts to make those changes a reality. My research has explored post-operative opioid prescribing, abdominal wall hernia repair, and long-term health changes after bariatric surgery. I’ve also written a lot about the Collaborative Quality Initiatives, which really demonstrate what you can accomplish through statewide collaboration and partnership.

The Michigan Value Collaborative is such a critical engine for translating our research into real-world improvements for patient care, and I could not be happier to join such a talented and dedicated team. In my role at MVC, I’ll be engaged in studying the quality of surgical care in Michigan, collaborating on quality improvement initiatives, and helping identify new ways to enhance the care we deliver to patients.

I’m truly looking forward to the work ahead and to contributing to MVC’s mission of driving high-value, patient-centered care across the state.

0
View Post
December Workgroups Highlight RITE-Size Preoperative Testing and MVC Year End Reflections and Goals

December Workgroups Highlight RITE-Size Preoperative Testing and MVC Year End Reflections and Goals

In December, Michigan Value Collaborative’s (MVC) preoperative testing workgroup featured a co-presentation by Kelly Lewton, RN, BSN, Performance Improvement Coordinator for Lake Huron Medical Center, and Nicole Mott, MD, MSCR, a National Clinician Scholar at the University of Michigan supported by the Veterans Administration and a general surgery resident at the University of Colorado. The presentation focused on the Right-Sizing Testing Before Elective Surgery (RITE-Size) trial; Dr. Mott was the lead author on a recently published paper in JAMA Network Open that described the components and impact of the trial, and Lewton shared her first-hand experience as the lead during Lake Huron Medical Center’s participation in the trial. RITE-Size works with hospitals to identify and right-size testing before elective surgery procedures. The second workgroup, health in action, featured MVC Site Engagement Coordinator Emily Bair, MS, MPH, RDN, CSP, and the Engagement team and focused on a year in review of quality initiatives across MVC members. The MVC Coordinating Center hosts one to two workgroup presentations per month covering a variety of topics including post-discharge follow-up, sepsis, cardiac rehabilitation, rural health, preoperative testing, and health in action.

Preoperative Testing Workgroup - RITE-Size & Lake Huron Medical Center

The RITE-Size trial is a partnership among quality improvement teams in Michigan including the Michigan Program on Value Enhancement (MPrOVE), the MVC Coordinating Center, the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC), and the Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE). Dr. Mott shared that the goal for RITE-Size participants is to lower unnecessary preoperative testing before elective outpatient cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and lumpectomy. Routine preoperative testing before these low-risk surgeries has shown no clinical benefit to the patient but has led to multiple downstream consequences such as increased spending, care cascades, and treatment delays (Dossett & Wilkinson, 2022).

Dr. Mott described that RITE-Size launched a pilot feasibility study in March 2024 at three hospitals in Michigan. The study aimed to meet criteria in several areas such as feasibility (implementation in the appropriate amount of time), testing rates (reduction), and acceptability and appropriateness (results from interviews). By August 2024, the desired milestones had been achieved, showing a 68% reduction in unnecessary testing at all participating sites (Figure 1).

Figure 1. MVC RITE-Size Pilot Program Testing Rates Over Time Across All Three Sites from March-April 2024 to July-August 2024

line graph depicting reduction in unnecessary preoperative testing at three pilot sites

Some barriers that impacted the study included lack of clarity about guidelines, a need for ongoing education due to the automated nature of testing processes, and coordination across a large healthcare system and/or within the limitations of institutional rules. Elements that led to success included strong leadership through key collaborators, incorporation of the initiative into policy, self-monitoring throughout, and team cohesiveness and communication. The pilot's success allowed RITE-Size to expand to other sites across Michigan.

Lewton from Lake Huron Medical Center (LHMC) followed the RITE-size presentation sharing first-hand experience of participating with the initiative in 2025. She described the site onboarding process, which included a RITE-Size site visit in July 2025 where her team worked with Dana Greene, Jr., Project Manager at MPrOVE, to discuss LHMC interventions and progress over the duration of the program and to schedule ongoing coaching sessions (Figure 2).  After investigating preoperative testing rates, LHMC found that their biggest outlier was electrocardiograms (EKGs) ordered by a particular surgeon.

After the site visit, the lead anesthesiologist met with the surgeon, and they discovered he had been given outdated testing guidelines when he onboarded. With this discovery, their team was able to review their testing guidelines and begin the process of updating and educating team members. By November 2025, LHMC saw a notable decrease in preoperative testing for low-risk surgeries and began development for an updated version of their pre-admission testing (PAT) guidelines.

Figure 2. LHMC Timeline of RITE-Size Pilot Work

Lake Huron Medical Center timeline of RITE-Size pilot work

Lewton rounded out the presentation sharing that the RITE-Size project helped LHMC to update their care guidelines, improve patient care, and reduce unnecessary testing. RITE-Size also provided many resources for staff to help with new process implementation and coached staff to use evidence-based research to guide everyday practice.

MVC Preoperative Testing Workgroup: Dec. 2, 2025

Health in Action Workgroup - MVC Coordinating Center

This month’s health in action workgroup was led by MVC Site Engagement Coordinator Emily Bair, MS, MPH, RDN, CSP, with support from other staff at the MVC Coordinating Center. The workgroup encapsulated a year in review for member QI work in 2025 as well as a look ahead at 2026.

Bair shared result highlights from the MVC QI survey that many MVC members completed in June 2025, noting several common QI efforts across the state (Figure 3). The top areas of focus were sepsis, readmissions, transitions of care, population health management, and emergency department care. Of the 88 survey responses, there were a total of 65 hospitals, 8 physician organizations, and 15 hospital systems represented.

Figure 3. Statewide QI Initiatives in 2025

Statewide QI Initiatives in 2025 depicting sepsis, readmissions, transitions of care, population health management, and emergency department care

Some of the common barriers identified by member sites in the survey included insufficient resources and funds, staff burnout, high turnover, and staff shortages.

The MVC QI survey also sought to consider the needs of its members and asked participants to provide suggestions for how MVC can best support them in the upcoming year (Figure 4). The top requests included data and report-specific training, recordings and summaries of workgroups for those unable to attend events, user-friendly reports, smaller and more frequent breakout sessions during virtual events, and data and QI topics that are helpful for all types of hospital sites.

Figure 4. MVC Member Suggestions for Future Offerings

Graphic Summary of MVC Member Suggestions for Future Offerings

Bair reminded participants that MVC uploads virtual workgroup recordings to MVC’s YouTube channel and shares the link with members in a post-workgroup summary email along with slides and resources from presentations. To support members in accessing additional training opportunities, MVC has launched its new new site coordinator education program in January 2026. The four-module training is designed to provide a more individualized approach to building knowledge as an MVC site coordinator. The MVC QI survey was also a helpful resource for presenter recruitment, developing 2025 workgroup content, and planning 2026 offerings.

Following the 2025 review, participants engaged in an interactive polling activity about QI progress from the past year (Figure 5), areas of focus, and their key accomplishments. Some of the successes shared included improving compliance with the sepsis bundle, maintaining a low readmission rate, increased senior/executive leadership engagement, and a department-led change to improve utilization.

Figure 5. MVC Participants QI Progress Word Cloud

MVC Participants QI Progress Word Cloud

Workgroup participants were asked to share some of their QI priorities for 2026, including ways that their sites are trying to align with other services or programs and how MVC can best support them. Several shared they will focus on the following priorities in 2026:

  1. Sepsis compliance improvement
  2. Streamlining order sets to reduce sepsis fallouts
  3. Reducing readmissions
  4. Building connections with primary care clinics
  5. Reducing length of stay
  6. Reducing unnecessary preoperative testing by participating in the RITE-Size trial
  7. Reducing hospital acquired infections
  8. Interviewing readmissions patients

Participants also shared different ways they are working to align with Collaborative Quality Initiatives (CQI) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) measures. Several sites noted that they are shifting to align their sepsis metrics with the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium (HMS) sepsis initiative and the CMS Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements.

Members expressed interest in learning more about local quality leaders, developing effective committee structures within their sites, and acquiring new resources that might be available. Additionally, there was great interest in MVC’s new site coordinator education program that kicked off this January with modules that support site coordinators via one-on-one tailored training. Registration for the education program is closed for Q1 – Q2, and a waitlist has been started for Q3 – Q4. If you are a site coordinator interested in participating, you can submit an interest form. [LINK]

MVC welcomes workgroup presenters from across Michigan to share their expertise, success stories, initiatives, and solution-focused ideas with MVC members. Please reach out to us by email or by submitting a presentation proposal here if you are interested in sharing your work in a presentation.

MVC Health in Action Workgroup: Dec. 18, 2025

0
View Post
Celebrating 2025 Successes and Setting the Stage for 2026

Celebrating 2025 Successes and Setting the Stage for 2026

On behalf of the MVC Coordinating Center, let me first start this end-of-year blog by thanking you all for your partnership and continued support throughout 2025. In case you blinked and its now December – don’t worry, you’re not alone! The last year has flown by with plenty of twists and turns along the way. Before we get caught up in the holidays and planning for 2026, we wanted to step back and celebrate the successes we achieved together over the last 12 months.

In writing my reflection piece last year, I highlighted that both our engagement participation and analytics utilization were far above previous years. While this gave us a hard act to follow, we are delighted to share that this trend continued upwards in 2025. Over the last year, we welcomed two new hospital members to the collaborative, delivered 23 virtual workgroups with an average attendance of 41, facilitated 24 different member presentations, completed 9 site visits, delivered 14 custom analytic requests, and supported 106 new users in gaining access to our online registry. On top of all of this, we held two collaborative wide meetings in Midland and Livonia, with 197 member representatives joining us to share stories, spotlight successes, and support one another in navigating all of the challenges which 2025 decided to bring.

These flagship numbers only tell one part of the story; the true value of each of the activities detailed above comes from the relationships and partnerships developed as a result of the time spent together. We hope you all have taken as much benefit from these collaborations as our group has during this time. Which brings me to another highlight…the MVC Coordinating Center. Let’s take a moment to celebrate the people who not only help make all of the above possible but that make this such a great place to work. Thank you to the entire MVC team for your hard work and commitment to supporting our members throughout 2025. I’m excited for what the next year will hold. Speaking of which, here’s a sneak peek of a few things that will be taking place in 2026.

Collaborative Wide Meetings, Networking Events, and Virtual Workgroups

MVC’s 2026 engagement events calendar is now live. Our spring collaborative wide meeting will take place on Friday, May 8 in Traverse City and we will be returning to Livonia for our fall meeting on Friday, October 9. These forums continue to be supported by virtual and in-person networking activities and dinners throughout the year, and dates for our regular suite of virtual workgroups can also be found on the 2026 calendar. Save the dates - we look forward to seeing you at each of these events!

MVC Site Visits

We visited a number of you in 2025, providing the opportunity to strengthen our understanding of member activities, priorities, and system-level practices. This effort will continue next year, and members can participate in these site visits in either a virtual or in-person capacity, with P4P engagement points on offer for taking part. If you are interested in getting on the calendar for 2026, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

MVC Site Engagement Coordinator Education Program

In response to member feedback, MVC will be launching a new Site Coordinator Education Program in 2026, designed to offer a flexible, individualized, rolling training curriculum to provide members with a stronger understanding of MVC data, share tools to help evaluate metric progress, and facilitate peer collaborations. This program is in high demand with capacity already met for the first round of registration. Additional opportunities to participate in this new education program will open throughout the calendar year – more communications to follow!

New MVC Component of the BCBSM P4P Program PY26/27 Registry Pages & Webinars

As with previous cycles, new P4P pages will be launched at the turn of the year to correspond with the changes implemented for PY26/27. These pages will look and feel similar to those currently available with a few important updates to reflect changes to our episode spending and value metric menu options and the introduction of MVC’s new Health Outcome Variation Measure. The latter reflects a new metric to the MVC Component, and to support members in navigating and utilizing these new registry pages, dedicated explainer webinars will be held in January.

MVC Push Reports and Custom Analytics

As highlighted above, MVC’s push reports and offer of custom analytics were well utilized by members in 2025, and to reflect member feedback, efforts will be spent strengthening this offering for member benefit in 2026. Remember, if you are interested in working with the Coordinating Center on a custom build, reach out to us by email. [LINK]

Thank you again for your continued partnership throughout the last year and we look forward to more successes in 2026. Have a great holiday and a happy new year when it rolls around.

0
View Post
November Workgroups Highlight Mobile Health and Patient Storytelling

November Workgroups Highlight Mobile Health and Patient Storytelling

In November, MVC hosted two virtual workgroup presentations – the first, a rural health workgroup, featured Hillsdale Hospital’s mobile health unit initiative. The second, a post-discharge follow-up workgroup, continued a presentation started at MVC’s February 2025 health in action workgroup on patient journey mapping and introduced a joint patient storytelling project by Healthy Behavior Optimization for Michigan (HBOM) and Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network (MiCR). The MVC Coordinating Center hosts workgroup presentations twice per month covering a variety of topics including post-discharge follow-up, sepsis, cardiac rehab, rural health, preoperative testing and health in action.

Rural Health Workgroup – Hillsdale Hospital 

The first workgroup of the month provided a review of Hillsdale Hospital’s mobile health unit, which aims to deliver essential health services to patients living in rural communities who may otherwise struggle physically or financially to reach traditional care settings.

As Lindsey Crouch, Director of Outpatient Clinics, Home Care, and Durable Medical Equipment for Hillsdale Hospital explained, rural communities face higher health outcome variation, transportation issues, limited accessibility to primary care providers, and high unnecessary emergency department (ED) utilization (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Hillsdale County Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Survey Data: Difficulty Finding or Getting Transportation to a Doctor in 2024, 2022, 2019, and 2016

vertical bar graph: Hillsdale County Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Survey Data: Difficulty Finding or Getting Transportation to a Doctor in 2024, 2022, 2019, and 2016

During the Covid-19 pandemic, Hillsdale County’s health department purchased a mobile health unit in an effort to close the gap in healthcare access for their community. However, despite continued need, utilization of the mobile unit has waned in recent years.

Hillsdale Hospital aimed to revitalize the mobile health unit to:

  1. Bridge access gaps in rural areas. For many rural residents, distance to hospitals or clinics, limited transportation, and infrastructure challenges can hinder timely access to care. A mobile health unit can bring services to patients rather than requiring patients to travel long distances. This helps to reduce one significant non-medical barrier to care.
  2. Focus on preventive and ongoing care. The mobile unit’s design supports not just acute care, but preventive services — screenings, check-ups, chronic disease management — especially helpful for rural populations that may have higher chronic disease burden and less frequent access to routine care.
  3. Address gaps in health outcomes between communities. By delivering care directly to underserved communities, this model aligns with broader efforts to ensure that where a person lives does not determine whether they receive high-value, quality healthcare.

Throughout this program, Hillsdale Hospital aimed to improve health outcome variation with a goal to achieve a 15% improvement in selected chronic disease metrics (e.g., blood pressure control) while also establishing partnerships with local organizations for sustainability.

Throughout the presentation and follow-up discussion, participants addressed several key considerations related to implementing and operating the mobile health unit including:

  • Logistical planning & scheduling. Which rural towns or areas will be served? How often do visits occur? How to communicate the schedule to residents to maximize utilization?
  • Service offerings. What mix of services beyond basic triage should be included? Considerations may include screenings, chronic disease management, preventive care, and referrals when needed to ensure the mobile unit meaningfully supplements local rural healthcare capacity.
  • Coordination with local providers. What existing local hospitals, clinics, and community health organizations should be involved to ensure continuity of care? Consider these, especially follow-up and referrals, for more advanced services.
  • Addressing rural-specific challenges. What unique barriers impact your community? Consider transportation, limited staffing, and supply chain constraints.

Hillsdale Hospital’s mobile health unit embodies a vision for bringing high-value, high-quality care to rural Michigan. By lowering access barriers and delivering preventive and ongoing services directly to patients in their communities, this initiative can help improve health outcomes, reduce reliance on emergency services, and foster trust in healthcare among rural residents.

Insights from this workgroup have several practical implications for other rural hospitals and provider organizations across Michigan:

  • Expansion is possible through mobile care. Rural hospitals can leverage mobile health units as an extension of their current clinical outreach, helping to connect with populations that may rarely visit brick-and-mortar facilities.
  • Support chronic disease management. By delivery of routine care and screenings, mobile units can help stabilize chronic conditions earlier, reducing acute exacerbations and potentially reducing avoidable ED visits.
  • Enhance care coordination. Partnering with mobile health teams and community resources can help coordinate follow-up appointments, testing, and specialty referrals to create a more continuous care experience for rural patients.
  • Advance population health goals. Mobile services can function as a tool within a hospital’s broader population health strategy, align with value-based initiatives, community health needs assessments, and provide the opportunity for all people to achieve optimal health goals.
  • Gather meaningful community insights. Regular presence in rural communities can help hospitals better understand local barriers, non-medical drivers of health, and other care gaps which may inform program planning, grant proposals, and collaborative partnerships.

MVC Rural Health Workgroup: Nov. 4, 2025

Post-Discharge Follow-Up Workgroup – MVC and HBOM

The second MVC workgroup of November featured a joint presentation by MVC’s Associate Program Manager, Jana Stewart, MPH and HBOM’s Informatics Design Lead, Noa Kim, MSI. The workgroup kicked off with an overview of the rationale behind placing a greater emphasis on post-discharge follow-up – particularly how timely and effective follow-up care can reduce readmissions, improve patient outcomes, and ease transitions from inpatient to outpatient or home settings.

Next, as a continuation of the February 2025  health in action workgroup presentation on patient journey mapping, Stewart showed how mapping can be used to highlight key moments in a coronary heart failure (CHF) patient’s journey where there may be opportunities for post-discharge care coordination improvement – e.g., medication reconciliation, patient knowledge, frequent rehospitalization, low follow-up rates, and lack of social and community support.

An important strategy for combating these challenges for CHF patients is engagement in cardiac rehabilitation. And yet, patients rarely optimize this opportunity. Patient storytelling can help patients recall details, model scenarios a patient may experience in the future, and reduce the burden of information provided during a visit and may be a strategy to optimize cardiac rehab enrollment.

Under the umbrella of Michigan Cardiac Rehab (MiCR), a collaboration between the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2), MVC, and HBOM, several initiatives have been developed aimed at optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy including the development of NewBeat materials and now the Heart-to-Heart storytelling campaign (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Examples of MiCR Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Campaigns

NewBeat materials and the Heart-to-Heart storytelling campaign

As Kim explained, the goals of the Heart-to-Heart project are to collect diverse first-person accounts of cardiac rehab in video, audio, and photo formats from patients and clinicians from across Michigan to produce a compelling, free, reusable story library for use by cardiac rehab advocates across Michigan and beyond.

For hospitals and health systems across Michigan seeking to improve post-discharge outcomes, insights from this workgroup offer the following next steps:

  1. Use journey mapping and storytelling in quality improvement. By mapping patient journeys and capturing patient experiences, providers can better identify and address systemic barriers to safe discharge and recovery.
  2. Adopt standardized discharge-to-follow-up workflows. Hospitals should ensure that discharge planning includes scheduling follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear communication of next steps before patients leave the hospital.
  3. Prioritize high-risk patients for post-discharge support. Patients with chronic illness, limited social support, or social determinants that might hinder recovery deserve extra attention during discharge planning and follow-up scheduling.
  4. Assign care coordinators or navigators. Especially for high-risk or complex patients, dedicated staff to oversee follow-up care – manage appointments, support communication, track adherence, and offer resources – may reduce readmissions and improve outcomes.
  5. Leverage post-discharge care as part of value-based care strategy. Effective follow-up after discharge supports long-term patient health, reduces avoidable costs, and aligns with goals of high-value care frameworks.

MVC Post-Discharge Follow-Up Workgroup: Nov. 20, 2025

If you are interested in pursuing a healthcare quality improvement project, MVC has data specialists available to help you navigate our data resources and create custom analytics reports to support your efforts. Please reach out to us by email [LINK] if you would like to learn more about MVC data or engagement offerings!

0
View Post
Highlights from the 4th Annual Michigan Cardiac Rehabilitation Network (MiCR) In-Person Meeting in Troy, MI

Highlights from the 4th Annual Michigan Cardiac Rehabilitation Network (MiCR) In-Person Meeting in Troy, MI

The Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network (MiCR) held its fourth annual in-person meeting at Corewell Health East in Troy, MI on Nov. 13, 2025. The full slide deck is now available [LINK]. Opening the meeting’s agenda was Mike Thompson, PhD, MPH, co-director of MiCR and senior advisor at MVC. He welcomed attendees to the Corewell Health Beaumont Troy campus, announced the finalization of MiCR’s two-year strategic plan (Figure 1), and shared that Henry Ford Hospital was receiving the final MiCR Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization Award mini grant to support their QUASAR project, which pilots a hub-and-spoke telehealth model for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery. He also highlighted renewed engagement of the MiCR Advisory Council and ongoing collaboration with the Healthy Behavior Optimization for Michigan (HBOM) team to collect patient stories.

Figure 1. 2025-2027 MiCR Operational and Strategic Framework

MiCR framework: data analytics/benchmarking, collaboration & learning, QI support, MiCR impact & engagement

Dr. Thompson described MiCR’s strategic initiatives in two key areas: telehealth and medication management. For telehealth, MiCR is employing a multi-pronged approach that includes surveys, qualitative interviews, and stakeholder outreach to understand the current state, implementation plans, and barriers to telehealth CR implementation in Michigan. This effort will also include an evaluation of the value and utilization of existing resources that support telehealth CR. In the realm of medication management, MiCR is using claims data to assess variability in medication adherence among CR participants and applying surveys, interviews, and outreach to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. These efforts will lead to actionable plans designed to help stakeholders implement initiatives that elevate CR services across the state.

MiCR/HBOM Heart-to Heart Collaboration Update

Larrea Young, MDes, a human-centered design project manager at HBOM, announced the launch of Heart-to-Heart, a new initiative designed to inspire both patients and providers by collecting and sharing diverse stories of patient experiences with CR. The goal of this effort is to foster broader conversations about the life-changing impact of CR and encourage patient enrollment by providing strong peer endorsements. The HBOM and MiCR teams are gathering first-person accounts in video, audio, and photo formats to create an engaging, free, and reusable story library for CR advocates across Michigan and beyond. Progress so far includes 10 patient interviews at two sites, representing a wide range of demographics and experiences. HBOM previewed a clip from a patient interview at the meeting. Clinicians were also encouraged to contribute to the effort by sharing voice messages about cardiac rehabilitation through Speakpipe.

Leveraging National CR Quality Improvement (QI): Efforts, Updates, and Next Steps

Megan Gross, MPH, CHES, ACSM-CEP, EIM, clinical exercise physiologist at Holland Hospital and board director of the Michigan Society for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (MSCVPR), shared a summary of national CR QI efforts and discussed how her organization has leveraged these initiatives to advance local QI projects. She identified tools and resources, advocacy, and QI champions as the core “pillars” of quality improvement, all supported by a foundation of data. Gross highlighted nationally available resources such as the Million Hearts/American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) Cardiac Rehab Change Package and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) TAKEheart initiative, as well as ongoing advocacy, research, and publications. Encouraging all CR program staff to view themselves as champions, she transitioned to describe how Holland Hospital has applied these tools in their own QI efforts, concluding with a description of their project to implement an inpatient liaison model aimed at increasing CR participation.

Understanding the Physiologic and Clinical Significance of Metabolic Equivalents (METS)

Barry Franklin, PhD, a director emeritus of preventive cardiology and cardiac rehabilitation at Corewell Health East, gave a presentation explaining the physiological and clinical significance of metabolic equivalents (METs). Dr. Franklin summarized key lessons from his 50-year career in clinical exercise physiology, highlighting topics such as energy systems for exercise, acute cardiorespiratory responses (VO2 max), METs, anaerobic (ventilatory) threshold, fitness and mortality, fitness in relation to surgical outcomes and health care costs, and clinical considerations for prescribing exercise intensity. Dr. Franklin’s key take home message related to his guidelines and recommendations for moving patients from achievement of lower to higher METs through CR participation.

Sustaining Cardiac Rehab Through Health System Integration

Brett Reynolds, MPH, ACSM-CEP, and Cindy Haskin-Popp, MS, ACSM-CEP, of Corewell Health East shared their multi-year journey to build a fully integrated CR service line after the Corewell Health merger. They detailed key phases from planning and collaboration, such as forming committees, aligning workflows, and engaging stakeholders, to implementation, which involved developing communication channels, Epic workflow training, and designating super users for consistency. Post-integration successes included cross-training, improved communication, standardized competencies, and better patient care (Figure 2), while ongoing challenges remain in areas like documentation and order set variation. Looking forward, the team aims to pursue AACVPR accreditation, standardize patient education, and create a centralized referral process to further improve care quality and patient experience.

Figure 2. Corewell Health System CR Post-Integration Outcomes

Corewell Health System CR post-integration outcomes: wins

Medication Management Breakout Session

Following lunch, MVC Project Manager Emily Woltmann, PhD, MSW, led attendees through an interactive breakout session that explored roles, responsibilities, and strategies related to medication management in CR. Participants met in small groups to discuss strategies and barriers to addressing medication management issues with their CR patients (Figure 3). The information gathered will be used by the MiCR team to help drive forward the MiCR medication management strategic initiative.

Figure 3. MiCR Co-Director Mike Thompson facilitating a medication management breakout discussion

Data Presentation and Panel Discussion on CR Completion Rates

Dr. Thompson led a session utilizing MVC claims data, which shared aggregate and unblinded data on CR completion rates across Michigan. This included a summary of the proportion of participating patients who finished the widely recommended 36 sessions, as well as those who completed at least 12 or 24 sessions. The findings revealed substantial variability among cardiac rehabilitation programs based on both metrics, with completion rates for the full 36 sessions ranging from 0% to 50% at CR programs across Michigan.

A subsequent panel discussion moderated by Dr. Thompson included Amy Poindexter, BS, CEP, CR manager at Trinity Health Ann Arbor and Livingston Hospitals, Amber Steele, BS, ACSM-CEP, CR lead at McLaren Bay Region Hospital, and David Running, BS, ACSM-CEP, CEPA, supervisor of CR at University of Michigan Health-West. Both the panel and the audience voiced a variety of strategies they use to increase session attendance in CR, such as developing supportive relationships with patients, watching for plateaus in progress, and having completion rituals and celebrations when a patient graduates from CR. The most frequently cited challenges to patients completing an adequate number of sessions were barriers related to the travel distance to CR programs and medical insurance copays.

AACVPR President Stacey Greenway Presents Keynote on AACVPR Strategic Plan

Stacey Greenway, MA, MPH, MAACVPR, ACSM-CEP, the newly elected president of AACVPR, delivered the meeting keynote, highlighting AACVPR’s growing multidisciplinary membership, widely recognized training and certification programs, and enhanced data registry resources for cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation professionals. She outlined the 2026–2028 strategic plan focused on increasing awareness and engagement, advancing innovative delivery models like telehealth, and strengthening research and outcomes through a national network. Greenway encouraged MiCR members to participate nationally via opportunities such as the AACVPR quality improvement cohort, day on the hill, and legislative advocacy, and she invited involvement in content submission and session proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting in San Antonio, TX.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Dr. Jessica Golbus, MD, MS, Co-Director of MiCR, wrapped up the meeting with a summary of the day’s key points and next steps. She shared that a follow-up email will be sent in the coming weeks and announced the dates for MVC cardiac rehabilitation virtual workgroups scheduled for 12 p.m. on Feb. 10, June 9, and Oct. 20 in 2026. The date for MiCR’s spring webinar will be announced soon.

MiCR is a partnership between BMC2 and MVC, the purpose of which is to improve access to, utilization of, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation services across the state of Michigan. MVC is proud to partner with providers, hospitals, and fellow CQIs in advancing quality initiatives that benefit patients in Michigan. If you have questions about any of the topics discussed at the MiCR annual meeting or are interested in following up for more details on other initiatives, email the MiCR leadership team [EMAIL] or the MVC Coordinating Center [EMAIL].

0
View Post
MVC Announces Meeting Dates, Workgroups, and Trainings Available in 2026

MVC Announces Meeting Dates, Workgroups, and Trainings Available in 2026

As we head into the holiday season and final months of calendar year 2025, the MVC Coordinating Center has been planning for its 2026 engagement activities. At MVC's most recent fall collaborative-wide meeting in October, MVC first announced several key dates and updates related to next year’s engagement offerings. 

MVC’s 2026 event calendar is available now [PDF]. Of note, MVC site coordinators can see the dates for 2026 collaborative-wide meetings (Figure 1) and workgroups, as well as the months in which MVC will offer in-person or virtual networking events. MVC will head to Traverse City for its spring collaborative-wide meeting on May 8, 2026. MVC will return to Vistatech in Livonia for its fall collaborative-wide meeting on Oct. 9, 2026. 

Figure 1.

Also available is MVC’s Program Year (PY) 2026 P4P Engagement Point Menu [PDF]. Engagement activities offered in 2025 will largely continue along with some minor changes and new additions.

Earning P4P Engagement Points in 2026

In PY 2026 of the MVC Component of the BCBSM P4P Program, members can continue to earn up to two engagement points by completing eligible MVC activities. Many of the engagement point activities from PY 2025 remain available, such as attending or presenting at eligible MVC events, participating in site visits, utilizing MVC custom analytics, and survey submissions (Figure 2). Some of these offerings will have minor adjustments to their allotted point values. For example, attending a collaborative-wide meeting will now be worth 0.4 points compared to 0.25 points in 2025, and worth 1 point in 2026 for attending both meetings versus 0.75 in 2025.

Figure 2.

Another minor change is the number of virtual workgroups offered. MVC will offer 18 virtual workgroups in 2026; these workgroups will continue to focus on similar topics and themes, including cardiac rehabilitation, preoperative testing, post-discharge follow-up, rural health, health in action, and sepsis.

New Engagement Offering

MVC is excited to introduce one new offering in 2026: site coordinator education modules. These modules will support site coordinators via one-on-one tailored training that covers a variety of topics (Figure 3). Site coordinators can receive 0.2 engagement points per module and may participate in as few as one module or all four within the performance year. Each quarter of 2026, MVC will offer limited registration to participate in a module. Registration to begin participating in 2026 Q1 will start in December 2025. Training topics provide a review of:

  1. Overview of MVC’s mission, history, P4P program, and site coordinator role
  2. Training on MVC claims data, metrics, and reports
  3. Introduction to MVC’s value-based initiatives and the CQI model
  4. Meeting with other site coordinators to collaborate and discuss practices

Figure 3.

Site coordinator education modules

As part of the online training, site coordinators will complete a structured education plan with individualized guidance to deepen understanding of how to get the most value out of MVC’s offerings.

Earn Engagement Points by Being a Presenter

For those sites participating in the MVC Component of the BCBSM P4P Program, being a presenter at an MVC event is an opportunity to earn 0.5 points toward your hospital’s PY26 engagement points. By sharing successes, lessons learned, and helpful tools with members from across the state, presenters play an important role in improving outcomes for all Michigan patients. MVC’s Engagement team is here to support you every step of the way, making the experience of presenting as easy and comfortable as possible. Presentation proposals are accepted on a rolling basis through MVC's online form.

MVC offers a variety of opportunities to engage with the Coordinating Centers and other members of the collaborative to support peer learning, best practice sharing, and networking. These activities and events foster a collaborative learning environment that enables providers to learn from one another in a cooperative, non-competitive space, and is therefore core to MVC’s efforts to support sustainable, high-value healthcare delivery across the state. We look forward to engaging with you and your teams next year. Please contact the Coordinating Center with any questions [EMAIL].