At its foundation, healthcare quality improvement is a process of systematically improving care to better meet the needs of patients. Similarly, the concept of human-centered design thinking asks us to put people at the center of processes meant to address problems and improve outcomes. Although people have leveraged the concept of design to develop innovative solutions for centuries, “human-centered design thinking” is a relatively new approach in healthcare settings that is gaining in popularity.
One leader in this space is IDEO, a global design and innovation company; they launched a series of resources and toolkits to implement design thinking into tangible projects and emphasized the mindset behind the theory—the notion that how one thinks about design directly affects the impact of the solution. Through their design kit, IDEO suggests a three-step guide to cultivate a practical and repeatable approach to arriving at innovative solutions: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. IDEO urges professionals to connect with the population they wish to serve to ensure a project’s goals align with the needs of the intended community, and then to generate tangible ideas and solutions to address identified issues. This connection to a specific community puts the individuals they are designing for in the spotlight.
As the use of human-centered design thinking continues to grow, innovators continue to generate different visualizations of the process. Similar to IDEO’s three steps, another popular approach has been the Design Council’s double diamond model. Created to convey the process of design to designers and non-designers alike, this model (Figure 1) highlights a balance between big-picture thinking and detail-oriented refinements while translating ideas into action. This double diamond model was the guiding framework for the development of the Michigan Cardiac Rehabilitation network (MiCR) NewBeat materials – a partnership effort between MVC, BMC2, and HBOM (Figure 2). Strategically understanding the perspectives and needs of patients after undergoing a major cardiovascular event was pivotal to the success of the project.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Leading the NewBeat project was Larrea Young, who works as a multimedia and human-centered design project manager at MCT2D and HBOM. In reflecting back on the success of the cardiac rehab NewBeat project, she said, “One of the first questions we ask people when we talk about design is, what does it mean to design? People’s answers often focus on aesthetics; design makes things pretty or more accessible. While aesthetics is an important aspect of design, it is only one small part. We define design as envisioning and building a preferred future. This is the essence of the human-centered design process, an approach that examines challenges through lenses of aesthetics, culture, society, technology, and economics to define what something should be. In this process, we gain a deep understanding of people’s lived experiences, challenge conventional norms, and pilot innovative solutions. In the realm of healthcare, this process helps us build solutions that contribute holistically to the health and well-being of our providers and patients.”
Further evidence of the value of design thinking can be found in the quality improvement projects that placed critical importance on understanding the population they wished to serve. Many of these also have a heightened focus on patient-centered in the context of social drivers of health. Taking this into account, a number of healthcare initiatives are now incorporating a design thinking framework to ensure the circumstances, needs, and desires of patient populations are understood; and the results are promising.
In another recent study published in JAMA Network, Dr. Alex Peahl and colleagues wanted to determine how prenatal care could be redesigned to improve access and quality for Black pregnant people with low income. Utilizing human-centered design thinking, they interviewed 19 patients and 19 healthcare workers at prenatal care clinics in Detroit, Michigan, focusing on the first two phases of IDEO’s process: inspiration and ideation. In conducting this series of personalized interviews, Dr. Peahl and colleagues not only collected data to prove that current care failed to meet patient needs, but they also gathered ideas from the patient population of ways to redesign prenatal care for pregnant people in the community. By placing the individuals affected by the redesign at the center of a project, the team ensured the solutions they developed would lead to improved outcomes and experiences (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Recently, Dr. Alex Peahl, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor in Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Michigan, led the MVC Coordinating Center through a workshop on design thinking. Dr. Peahl outlined its principles, provided personal and professional examples from her work, and facilitated a space for MVC teammates to collaborate and practice design thinking with one another.
As the MVC Coordinating Center looks ahead, design thinking will be incorporated more frequently to improve the quality and impact of MVC offerings. If your team has successfully adopted human-centered design thinking or other patient-centered frameworks that can be shared with peers across the state, please contact MVC.
